This post is part of the My Favorite Classic Movie Blogathon in celebration of National Classic Movie Day ( May 16th ). Click here to view the schedule listing all the great posts in this blogathon. I have to tell ya, I’ve had many favorite movies over the years watching classic films.
For the longest time it was Barbara Stanwyck’s “The Strange Love of Martha Ivers.” Then there was a time when “Casablanca” had my heart and soul. But seeing it a few times in recent years has finally made me accept and solidify Alfred Hitchcock’s “VERTIGO” as my ultimate favorite classic movie. It absolutely mesmerizes me. First, it’s Hitchcock doing his level best to take the subject of love and how we love and who we love and turn it on its ear. Then it’s the perfect murder and how that gets hatched. Bernard Hermann has created a score for the ages with his romantic musical piece. I guess most of all “Vertigo’s” story of love poignantly pulls at my heartstrings. I can’t get that hurt and pain out of my mind and heart: Kim Novak’s longing for Scottie to love her real true self ( as Judy ). And the great James Stewart as Scottie, turned into a shell of a man ( a love zombie, if you will ) after losing the love of his life…until someone who looks like her appears one day on a busy San Francisco street.
I know the movie is either loved or reviled. And being the AFI’s pick as the favorite movie of all time probably did it no good. But I hope you see the movie for yourself and see if it doesn’t reach inside you as it has me. If you have a moment, let me introduce you to each character and their dilemma in this House of Cards.
( Some spoilers ahead. )
Put through their paces by ALFRED HITCHCOCK and caught between a rock and a hard place in “Vertigo” are its three stars: JAMES STEWART, KIM NOVAK and BARBARA BEL GEDDES. They each of them run into something bigger than they are; an emotion they cannot control.
The key to the movie is Kim Novak. If you don’t fall in love with her, if you’re not vested in her, “Vertigo” will not work for you. When Hitchcock first presents her to us at Ernie’s, if you do not give yourself over to her, you will not understand James Stewart’s character.
( And you’ve saved yourself a lot of heartache not falling head over heels in love, then. ) You’ve got to understand his feeling even if not fully identify WITH him. In fact, if you don’t give in to the emotion of the movie, if you don’t relinquish control, “Vertigo” will not work for you. Giving up control is the lynchpin for this film.
Barbara Bel Geddes ( MIDGE ) – There’s no reason in the world this attractive, sensible, good-natured, self-sufficient woman with a quick quip and a ready drink should not have had her love returned by Jimmy Stewart’s ‘Scottie.’ She’d be a good helpmate, a supportive companion. We’re not told why Midge breaks off their engagement in college. Perhaps she wanted a career before settling into marriage. Perhaps their life would be predictable, settled, routine.
What tears things apart for them now is the joke Midge plays on Scottie that goes too far. She paints herself into the portrait of Carlotta Valdes, the great-grandmother of the woman Scottie’s tailing. This mocking rib cuts too deep for Scottie. It’s a rough scene; a regretful turning point…a word said that you can not take back. I think she loses Scottie’s love, friendship…companionship right there on the spot.
A joke backfires The green mile
The next time she sees him he’s in a mental institution. Scottie’s in a bad way; pretty much catatonic. You can see Midge would be there for him through thick and thin; but she recognizes she’s competing with a ghost. Bel Geddes is good in that scene with Scottie…with that faint air of hope against hope. And then with the doctor ( Raymond Bailey, who played Mr. Drysdale on “The Beverly Hillbillies” ). She faces the loss with a sense of fair play, pragmatically…but it still hurts. Her walk down the hospital hallway and out of the movie is a sad one indeed. This walk down the corridor will strangely mirror Madeleine’s return later.
I have to add a wonderful comment that my friend Wendy wrote about the Midge character:
“God I love Midge! What I’ve never noticed is the warmth of the color scheme in this scene – the abundance of pink and cream, the flowers, the organized but homey mess, the warm midcentury tan of the wall and paintbrushes…. It explains Midge completely without any words at all. Oh and this is one of the rare instances of glasses being used to denote warmth and kindness in the movies. Or (just throwing this out there) perhaps it’s that Midge can see everything, but she cannot act. Her glasses are kind of a barrier between her and Scottie.”~Wendy Merckel 6/3/2017
James Stewart (SCOTTIE) – Would it be fair to ask him ‘tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all?’ His answer would be a bitter one. James Stewart is very interesting to watch in “Vertigo.” He goes through three personality stages. First he’s a good guy in a comfortable but unexciting relation-ship with Midge. He’s easy-going. …with a healthy amount of skepticism. He reluctantly takes the assignment of tailing his college friend’s wife. His world changes when he sees Madeleine for the first time. He gets to take her all in at Ernie’s. He follows her, saves her from drowning and wants to protect her. ( “No one possesses you, you’re safe with me.” ) She’s a beautiful girl. She makes him chase her by throwing out breadcrumbs of fear and anxiety. He falls in love with her… and I mean head over heels. He wants to help her solve the mystery of her life. Men are natural born Mr. Fix-Its and after all, solving mysteries is a detective’s stock and trade.
Part 2 of the movie comes after the fall; Scottie’s broken. Adding salt to the wound is this man whose summation at the inquest is an indictment of Scottie’s actions and character. It feels like he strips away any romantic notion we might have had of what we’ve seen earlier. He delivers the cold hard facts of the case with the slow-talking funereal intonation of an undertaker, publicly shaming Scottie in the bargain.
“Mr. Ferguson, being an ex-detective, would have seemed to be the proper choice for the role of watchdog and protector. As you have learned it was an unfortunate choice…”
Stewart has shifted from affable to passionate and wanting, to being a broken and hollow man; haunting old places he has wandered with Madeleine. Now his wandering is aimless…seeing her ghost at every turn. But he perks up when he sees a girl that reminds him of Madeleine. Her name is Judy and Stewart shifts gears again. He’s invigorated. Slowly he wants to change her. He starts with a slow boil but turns it up ( “It can’t mean that much to you.” ) His subtle insistence is now obvious to sales clerks, shoe salesmen and hairstylists alike.
“The gentleman does know what he wants.”
When Hitch pulls the big reveal, Stewart has Scottie go ballistic with anger at the betrayal. He is intense and totally convincing. I believe he could commit murder. But his anger is mixed with hurt. He is hurt to the core. Hitchcock puts Stewart through his paces. Stewart runs the gamut in “Vertigo” of desire, fear, love, anger, shame, passion, obsession.
Scottie’s emotional roller coaster is some of his own making.
Kim Novak ( MADELEINE/JUDY ) – She gives the performance of her career for Hitchcock. It’s not just the hair, make up and clothes but she creates two distinct personalities in Madeleine and Judy. When she merges the two, when she’s Judy dressed as Madeleine she’s like a third character. A hybrid – Madeleine’s look but Judy’s personality. For sure, Scottie’s all messed up. But Judy takes an emotional wallop too.
THE THREE FACES OF JUDY ( as Madeleine, Judy…and MadJudy? )
It wasn’t her intention to fall for Scottie. Sure Elster could give her a broad description for how to play Madeleine, but Judy had to fill in the particulars when coming face-to-face with Scottie. She definitely is lovely bait. And Judy is a good actress. When Scottie shows up at her hotel door, not a flinch of recognition from her.
We see every hurt Judy suffers as she tries to win Scottie’s heart by presenting herself as herself. Novak does hurt, very well. This may emanate from Novak herself having vul-nerability at her core. How masochistic is it for Judy to keep yourself in a position of hurt. But she’s in love with Scottie.
The die is cast:
“I made the mistake. I fell in love. That wasn’t part of the plan. I’m still in love with you and I want you so to love me. If I had the nerve I’d stay and lie, hoping that I could make you love me again as I am for myself.”
But the trippy thing is that the thing Scottie sees and feels inside Judy is what he responded to in Madeleine. Judy puts her self inside Madeleine. The outer shell was dif- ferent but the inner self remains the same. Isn’t that who we fall in love with…the person’s inner self? What a beautiful dance Scottie and Judy do.
Poor Scottie. Inch by inch he wants. Stewart is wonderful in this scene as he gently tries to coax her into giving herself over to him. And Novak is wonderful in this scene as well as she tries to fight what he wants, but gives in to it to have what she wants…his love. As Madeleine she is cool; as Judy she’s warm, poignant, wanting. Scottie has what he wants, but doesn’t know it. We see things in her that can play both ways because we know she’s one in the same person. Check out her little hesitation when he throws the pillow on the floor for her to sit by the fire; he gave “Madeleine” a pillow to sit on as well. I just noticed that after 5000 viewings. It’s not uncertainty, but her “remembering” what he did for her as Madeleine; how he treated her as Madeleine. And that little hesitation is for us to see since we know something Scottie doesn’t know.
Judy: “I wish you’d leave me alone. I want to go away.”
Scottie: “You can, you know.”
Judy: “No, you wouldn’t let me. I don’t want to go.”
Scottie: “Judy. Judy, I tell you this, these past few days have been the first happy days I’ve known in a year.
Judy: “I know. I know because, cause I remind you of her. And not even that
Scottie: “No. No Judy. Judy it’s you, too. There’s something in you that…”
Correct me if I’m wrong but “VERTIGO” might be one of a handful of movies made, MEANT to be viewed the second time. ( “The Sixth Sense” – “I see dead people.” Or “The Usual Suspects.” ) It’s the second time around where we can truly see how brilliant and subtle Kim Novak’s performance is. The second ( third, tenth, fiftieth ) time around we realize her actions and hesitations are at cross purposes to what Scottie is thinking about at the time.
Everything falls apart for Scottie and Judy. And boy, it gets ugly – messy, bitter, vio- lent…heartbreaking. Look at an Anthony Mann western to see James Stewart unleash his fury. “Why did you have to pick on me? Why me?!” But my heartache is his shift from anger to this: “I loved you so, Maddie.” Abject heartbreak. Isn’t that a question we’ve all wondered at one point or another. Judy’s fear is palpable. The girl is dragged, choked, scraped up and manhandled. Yes, she was an accomplice to murder. ( “…he chose you to be a witness to a suicide.” ) But she was also in love. She fights to plead her case. Of course you might say she’s merely a femme fatale who doesn’t want to get caught. I think she’s more than that; she’s begging, pleading to prove how much she loved him.
“Scottie, I was safe when you found me. There was nothing that you could prove. When I saw you again, I couldn’t run away. I loved you so. I walked into danger, let you change me because I loved you so.”
The ending? Sad. Perfect. Breathtaking. Heartbreaking. Hitchcock puts a period on it. “Vertigo” almost could not end any other way, not if Hitchcock has anything to do with it. And I wouldn’t have it any other way either.
Well done, Theresa!
I still question the nature of Scottie’s “love” for Madeleine. Can we really call it love when we don’t really know the object of our feelings? Madeleine is as much a creation of Scottie’s mind (with help from the prescient conspirators) as his remodeling of Judy into her image.
The tragedy of this story is that this man does not, can not, see beneath a woman’s skin. I often wonder how Elster, in creating the bait for Scottie, knew so well how to make her appeal to his inner longings. Perhaps the mysterious and vulnerable Madeleine he created is believed to represent the desire of all men. Or perhaps she represents the dream of Alfred Hitchcock.
It is also a tragedy that Judy, who surely knows Scottie better than he knows her, could so love someone who won’t look at her or seek to know her.
And poor Midge, waiting and hoping all those years since college for Scottie to grow up. Actually, she is the only character who has a chance to live a normal life. Her ineffably sad walk out of Scottie’s life may free her to love and be loved in return, assuming of course that there is at least one “normal” man out there.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You say: “I still question the nature of Scottie’s “love” for Madeleine. Can we really call it love when we don’t really know the object of our feelings?”
And by the letter of the law, no, Scottie’s love for Madeleine was not based on any real truthful knowledge of the person. So tell me Bob, what word CAN we use to express this intense emotional attraction we might have for the object-of-our-affection? Is Infatuation too weak a word? What, then?
You say: “I often wonder how Elster, in creating the bait for Scottie, knew so well how to make her appeal to his inner longings.”
I can only surmise Elster knew human nature. He needed someone to follow Madeleine ( Judy ) in order to get him to the scene of the soon to be commited crime. Human nature dictates how intrigued we are to know what we don’t yet know. He knew he’d follow her. But falling in love with her was the cherry on top.
You say: “It is also a tragedy that Judy, who surely knows Scottie better than he knows her, could so love someone who won’t look at her or seek to know her.”
Groucho says: “I don’t want to belong to any club that would accept me as one of its members.”
Apparently this happens to human beans all the time. Self-hatred? I dunno. There must be SOME payoff. “See…I KNEW I was UNlovable. Now, pass me the Haagen Dazs!”
You say: “And poor Midge, waiting and hoping all those years since college for Scottie to grow up. Actually, she is the only character who has a chance to live a normal life.”
I wish for Midge a fulfilling life. And she’ll have one…as soon as she quits working for a living and settle down to be a wife and mother.
Enjoyed this. Might have to watch it tonight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
At my local laundromat they have a big TV. Once, “Vertigo” was on. No! This is not the place to watch “Vertigo”. I will not. Of course, I was drawn in again. Left with my heart sore. I almost didn’t read your article because I knew that, again, I would leave with my heart sore. It’s not what I want from Hitch, but it is what he gave us. Brilliantly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Caftan Woman – How’s it going? Hitchcock in the Laundromat? LOL! Sounds reasonable to me, the way Hitch treats our emotions. We are washed, rinsed, tumbled and dried out after “VERTIGO.” I know what you mean about your heart being sore. My heart fairly aches as I watch Novak and Stewart. “I walked into danger. Let you change me because I loved you so much.”
“Why did you have to pick on me? Why me?!!!”
Hitchcock is a heartbreaker. Now pass me the fabric softener, STAT!
Love that film! First time I saw it I was indifferent to it. Waited a year and watched it again and as soon as it was over, re watched it and was hooked. Everything is close to perfect in Vertigo
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi JAKelly – I’m happy you came around to “Vertigo.” I think there are a lot of lessons for a young man. When you fall in love with a girl, what exactly ARE you falling in love with. Well…Hitch might not be the best guide in matters of the heart, but maybe he can show you red flags to look out for. Thank you for reading my entry. I’ll read your piece on “The Third Man.” That ending is DEVASTATING! ( Have you seen Allida Valli in Hitchcock’s “The Paradine Case”? It’s a must see if you haven’t already.
Excellent post on a great movie. Feel free to check out my entry. The link is below
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey there Joanie. Thank you for reading my entry for “My Favorite Classic Movie Blogathon.” “The Spiral Staircase” is a good one too. I’ll be reading your post. I’m a big Dorothy McGuire fan. Thanx again.
Awesome post. This film is practically my favorite (edged out by a nose by Sunset Boulevard). It is endlessly watchable and you always manage to see something new (or have a new thought/theory/obsession) with each viewing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hulllloooooh there – “Vertigo” beaten by a nose by “Sunset Boulevard.” Then I take my hat off to DeMille! L0L! That’s one of the most unsettling movies I’ve ever seen. It’s as if there is an electric fence around Desmond’s mansion, and there is no escape, except one way. I’m a big Bette Davis fan. But if she had won an Academy Award for “All About Eve” I wished for Swanson to share that award with her. Gloria Swanson gave her blood sweat and tears to portray Norma Desmond. Thank you for reading. Now let me get back to obsessing about a movie about obsession.
Love your description of VERTIGO as a film where Hitchcock turns love “on its ear.” It’s probably my second favorite classic movie for all the reasons that you describe. I agree that one’s admiration for the film hinges on how one feels about Kim Novak’s performance. This is the movie that made me a Kim Novak film. Honestly, I can’t imagine anyone else in the part: first playing what turns out to be a fictional enigma and then portraying the very sad Judy, who has to transform into an idealized woman to keep the man she loves. A fine contribution to the blogathon!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Rick for including my Essays on the Couch to join the fun on National Classic Movie Day. I love “Vertigo.” ( Uhhhhh…I guess I said that already. ) It’s trippy, that film; like peeling an onion that’s growing in on its own self. I think this is Kim Novak’s finest performance. She breaks my heart, that girl. Thanx for having me. 🙂
Great post about a marvelous movie. I loved how you broke down “MadJudy” and discussed Novak’s remarkable performance. You’ve made me want to watch this again! Thanks for a great review!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi there Blonde…
Thank you so much for reading about my favorite film what with the loads of writers who decided to weigh in on their favorite film for National Classic Movie Day. I thought Kim Novak gave a fantastic performance. I see your favorite film is “The More The Merrier“ AND you got to interview his son? Whoa! That movie is responsible for me NOT running in fear and dread when I see the great Charles Coburn. Listen, if a kid’s first introduction to Coburn is “In This Our Life” or “Kings Row”… wouldn’t YOU run? L0L! He was a delightful little pixie in this one, with a well-deserved Academy Award for his efforts. Thanks again for the compliment and taking the time to read my lovefest with “Vertigo.” I see I’ve got my work cut out for me to read everyone else’s selection. ( Which can be found here folks! )
I agree that this is a film that’s meant to be seen more than once. There are so many things to admire about it that you can’t digest them all at once.
Loved your analysis of the characters and the plot. I think you just articulated all the things I love about this film, but hadn’t put into words myself. Great choice!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much Silver Screenings. I thought long and hard about those characters and Hitch’s plot. It’s not like I had to work and go to school or anything. Luckily now I am retired and have no reason to cook and clean. Movies movies movies. LOL! Repeated viewing of this movie IS required. I’m convinced that those that say “I hate ‘Vertigo’,” don’t understand what they’ve seen because they’ve only seen it once. I’m also convince that those that say: “I hate ‘Vertigo'” are insane. So there’s that. Heeeeey, I hear you have a blogathon coming up at the end of June. “Don’t know much about history” as the ol’ song goes, but when we’re talkin’ about Classic Movie History…I’m there!
Oh yes, please join us! We’d love to have you!
I put my request in with Fritzi and wondered if a person could write about more than one era. I’ll await hearing from her on that score.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is the film that led me to fall in love with Kim Novak. Plain and simple. I’d noticed her in other films but this film is that I walked away from, completely enamored, knowing I had to see all her other films.
It’s a study of an injured psyche – hers – and also Jimmy Stewart’s (am I him?). In every part of VERTIGO, Kim’s eyes show anguish, somehow. She’s injured. She’s a victim. She might not even know it, but she suspects it, always. She’s never sure of what she’s doing, and not really convinced she should be – even when “I was in love” was her reason.
When I saw her TCM Festival interview (was that 2013’s or 2014’s?), I thougtht I was again observinig this ‘injured psyche’ character again.
It really bothered me. I found myself wanting to hunt down that director of her last film (whatever it was) and I wanted to punish him. “You made her quit making films THAT I WANTED TO SEE!! You robbed ME, therefore!!”
Kim – and Doris Day – are rather tragic figures for me because jackass men screwed them over and hurt them frequently enough that they just gave up. Making films FOR ME.
Y’know, I really do hate men. Really.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Ollie…welcome to “…the Couch.” And you’re weighing in on my favorite film “Vertigo.” Siiiigh! ( I hope the sign-in process wasn’t too cumbersome ).
I wonder if to some, or any extent, those of us who watch this movie are either Scottie or Judy. Maybe some of us who watch are just safe observers as we watch Hitch put these characters through the ringer. I may not be Judy…but I’m afraid I’ve been Scottie, and it’s not a great place to be, but it’s not like I engineered it that way. I just *a-hem* followed my heart and there I was…at a precipice, more ‘n likely looking down at myself. I think it’s essential, or at least very important, that we fall for Novak in this movie to understand how unreasonable Scottie is and how desperate Judy is. ( Yikes! I think that last sentence of mine was brilliant! )
I was IN the audience during the taping of the Robert Osborne / Kim Novak interview and I can tell you boy, that was an emotional experience for everyone in the theatre. I remember thinking “if SHE has felt like this, I don’t stand a freakin’ chance in life!!!” It’s very chivalrous of you to want to beat up the director(s) and producer(s) and studio heads and co-star(s) who made Novak feel less than. Her folks gave her a great start in life by telling her to say nothing, just stand there and look pretty. I truly hope she’s found her Voice now. I think she has. I love your chivalry for the selfish reason that beating up some dork ( and the word gettin’ out that Ollie’s comin’ so they better run!!!! ) might have stretched out her career just a little bit more and give us a couple more performances.
Novak wasn’t like Grace Kelly or Eva Marie Saint…loved, secure. Or like Marilyn and Jayne who wore and owned their sexuality proudly. Yes Novak was a bombshell, no doubt. But there was an inner struggle there that imbues her performances with the injured subtext we see and definitely feel. Good one about adding Doris Day to that tragic figure, though I think Day WAS a survivor. You continue to hunt down the bad guys who ruin women / actresses / musicians for the rest of us. In the meantime, we’ll just have to enjoy “Vertigo” and “Strangers When We Meet” and “Picnic” and “Middle of the Night” and any other movie Kim Novak made that strikes a chord with her fans. Thanks for your comments. Muaaaaah!!
(I would love my “going Bronson” on those dreadful jackasses to be ‘chivalrous, indeed, but there is a HUGE vein of selfishness that is motivating: “I want more of MY favorite movies!!” I would never be too friendly to McCartney, for example, because he and John robbed ME of 10 years of Beatles Music and when FREE AS A BIRD and REAL LOVE came out, I knew I’d been robbed because those two refused to give ME more of MY favorite music. Yeah. Resentful, I am. NOT chivalrous.)
I am left pondering all of Kim’s movies now. “If you added 50 years to any of her film’s stories, where would Her Character be?” In BELL BOOK & CANDLE, maybe she and Scotty-er-Shep had kids. He’s passed on (being older) but those kids now have kids. Gillian is a grandma… did some of her witchy talents return when the love of her life passed away? Will they now when those kids or grandkids start having odd ‘urges’? “No, it’s not just hormones. I KNOW it’s not!”
L0L!!! I’ll take your selfishness. “Go Bronson, young man.” Go Bronson if it means that some stars make more movies for us fans to see.
I’m impressed that you’re able to narrow your selection down to just one. I’m far too indecisive to ever do that!
I was surprised when this was named as the BFIs ‘greatest film’ a few years ago – every time I watch it I have a different interpretation and it’s impossible to truly get a handle on what I ‘feel’ about it. There’s so many unanswered or unexplained questions and I have a complicated relationship with the female objectification. In many ways, I think this is one of the most personal films Hitch ever made about film and his relationship within/to it. I’m always held back from naming this as a favourite as I find it a bit too long, also some of the symbolism is a little overwrought. But in spite of all that, I loved reading your review!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hear ya about female objectification…and I learned in my college days about the ‘male gaze.’ And I admit, I’m a brainwashed so and so. But I don’t want that spoilin’ a good movie for me. ( LOL! ) I’ve had a knock down drag out fight ( verbal…ha, fast & furious e-mails ) about “VERTIGO” with one of my friends, and this movie probably tends to be polarizing. But I am on the side of loving it and I am on the side of having any questions answered…and I’m even on the side of the director obsessing about a woman he could never have and deconstructing what Love is. ( It’s “Pygmalion Gone Wild!” 😉 ). I go with the spirit of the law, and this movie just carries me away and makes me ache. There are a bunch of other things I’m indecisive about in my life, but when it comes to movies…that’s a cinch. ( Maybe you can make a top ten favorites list and then you won’t have to choose just one ). I’m happy you read my review, and took time out to comment on it. At the very least I hope I made a good case for this film. Whew! There’s sure a lot of ground to cover with these blogathons, right? Thanks again.
A thoughtful review of a movie that provides a lot to think about. Thanks!
Thanks so much. Food for thought is all I ask ( if I cannot get total submission and agreement. ) Just kidding LOL! Thank you for reading my post. Appreciate it.